BLDGBLOG - We'd all be living in dams

[Arq.to]

We'd all be living in dams - Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:42:00 +0000

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1424/779893722_7795c405dc_b.jpg
[image: A "contour map" of Hoover Dam;

I've found myself in an ongoing thought experiment for the last few months, trying to imagine what would it would look like if theoretically non-domestic architectural styles were used to build the houses, or cities, of the future.
There are some obvious examples – designing houses like football stadiums, Gothic cathedrals, military bunkers, or nuclear missile silos – or even like Taco Bells, for that matter, or air traffic control towers – but there are also some less obvious, and far more interesting, possibilities out there.
Dams, for instance.
Why not build your house like a gigantic gravity dam? It wouldn't have to hold back water – so there'd be no flooding to worry about –*and you'd have big windows on either side.
You'd span canyons and have an incredible roof deck.
In fact, when I first saw the image, below, posted on The Cool Hunter back in December, I nearly passed out.

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1330/800511131_2cce2621b7_o.jpg
[image: A development in Songjiang, China, via The Cool Hunter].

Alas, it's not a dam at all, but the inner wall of a quarry (I still like it).
In any case, instead of building habitable bridges, like the Ponte Vecchio in Florence –

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1054/800607573_58c311bb36_o.jpg

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1276/800607529_a27cb6ec4a_o.jpg
[images: The Ponte Vecchio in Florence].

– or the Old London Bridge –

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1182/801720442_44daf48926_o.jpg

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1027/800607631_eea47674e3_o.jpg
[images: An image of "new houses" built across the river, followed by a spectacular image, by Peter Jackson, of the Old London Bridge itself].

– with the former example surely having been at least a subtle influence on the design of Constant's New Babylon –

http-~~-//farm1.static.flickr.com/190/453164094_d06ccdb9b0_o.gif

http-~~-//farm1.static.flickr.com/244/453164092_fb4ece306c_o.jpg
[images: Constant's New Babylon – not the same as this New Babylon, of course... though that would be interesting].

– you'd build habitable dams.
A whole suburb full of dam-houses, holding back no water. Great arcs of concrete towering over the landscape, full of kitchens. And there's not a river in sight. Or dozens of micro-dams, only three or four stories tall, forming Oscar Niemeyerian monoliths arranged around a cul-de-sac.
Families barbecue dinner in the backyard, shaded from the late summer sun by volumetric geometries of well-rebar'd slabs – great dorsal fins of engineering, sticking up from the landscape on all sides.

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1060/779893702_6cb8cb8dd8_o.jpg
[image: The "mechanisms" of Hoover Dam; view slightly larger. Imagine living inside a valve, or inside a penstock...].

You'd come home to this!

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1421/800954313_3671a30457_o.jpg
[image: The Eder Dam on the Edersee, Germany].

Your own little love-nest, nestled between hills – or standing out in the middle of nowhere.
The bachelor pad of the future... is a diversionary dam.
But habitable dams aren't even the main source of structural ideas that, I think, have been sadly neglected when it comes to designing houses; what really gets me going is thinking about how to use elevated highway ramps as a new form of single-family housing.

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1324/800750573_d12bd0223e_o.jpg

http-~~-//farm2.static.flickr.com/1283/800750579_e8ce9e36cf_o.jpg
[images: A truly awesome image of an elevated highway-house, architect unknown (if you know, please inform!); and some L.A. freeways, photographed by satellite].

But that will have to wait till another post...

Ler artigo...

[Arq.to]

Interessante...