Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
'>
'>
'>

May is Historic Preservation Month in the USA, so there's been a flurry of walking tours and special festivals to celebrate America's Colonial and Victorian architecture. But over the past few years, preservationists have been saying that we need to push at the boundaries of what we mean when we say historic. Although great progress is being made toward preserving buildings from the 1700s and 1800s, newer buildings often suffer neglect. Do we need to work harder to protect places like the Bauhaus house built by Walter Gropius? Is a building constructed in the mid-20th century "too new" to be saved? What do you think?

Fonte: AboutArchitecture

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.